|
On
November 29, 2007, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
(CMS) made public a list of 54 nursing homes – called Special Focus
Facilities (SFFs) – that provide especially poor quality care to
their residents. The CMS list includes no
more than three facilities in any state; California, with 1400
nursing homes, has one SFF on the list. The publicly-disclosed list
was part of a larger list of 128 facilities that were designated
SFFs as of October 2007. Nationwide, there are more than 16,000
nursing facilities. CMS's news release did not explain how the 54
SFFs were selected for public disclosure.
Background of SFFs
The SFF
program was originally created as part of President Clinton's
Nursing Home Initiative, announced in July 1998. The purpose of the
program was to focus additional survey attention on
poorly-performing facilities; two facilities selected in each state
would receive a second standard survey each year.
Revisions
to the SFF program were implemented on December 11, 2004. These
changes included increasing the total number of SFFs, using three
years of poor survey performance to select SFFs, and requiring
enforcement for SFFs that did not make significant progress after an
additional 18 months (three SFF surveys). Another revision made to
the program on November 2, 2007 (and revised December 7, 2007)
required that administrators, owners, and Boards of Directors be
notified of a facility's designation as an SFF and included CMS's
promise to make public a list of SFFs that did not make significant
improvement in the first survey following their initial designation
as an SFF.
Backlash to the Release of 54 SFF Names
On
December 5, the Des Moines Register reported that CMS, which refused
to disclose the full list of SFFs, had shared the complete list
"with lobbyists for the nursing home industry," specifically, with
the American Health Care Association (AHCA). A spokeswoman for AHCA
"said the association cannot publicly release its copy of the list
because of restrictions imposed by the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services," leading The Des Moines Register to observe,
"It's unusual for a government agency charged with protecting the
public to give information to an industry it regulates while
withholding that same information from the public."
Interest
in SFFs escalated. In a December 12 letter, Senator Barak Obama (D,
IL) and eight Senate co-signers asked Health and Human Services
Secretary Michael Leavitt to disclose the identity of all 128
Special Focus Facilities (SFFs) or to provide clear guidance to
states that they may disclose the information to the public. Citing
reports in the press that the complete list of SFFs has been
provided to AHCA, the Senators wrote, "Providing information about
poorly performing nursing homes to the lobbyists who represent those
facilities, and not to the senior citizens who would most benefit
from this information, is outrageous."
Senator
Hillary Clinton (D, NY) with two Senate co-signers has introduced
legislation, the "Nursing Home Quality and Transparency Act," (S.
2480) to require public disclosure of all facilities in the SFF
program.
Discussion
Under the
SFF program, CMS gives states a list of facilities that meet the
criteria for SFF and allows them to designate which facilities will
receive increased state monitoring. At its best, the SFF program
identifies some of the facilities that are providing the poorest
care and devotes some additional survey resources to them in an
effort to get them to achieve and maintain substantial compliance
with federal standards of care.
However,
even the full list of 128 facilities is far less than 1% of nursing
facilities nationwide, and many more facilities provide poor care to
their residents. The Center for Medicare Advocacy (the Center) is
concerned that disclosure of SFFs may suggest to the public,
inaccurately, that these are the only facilities that families and
prospective residents should avoid.
Over the
past year, the Center has also been concerned that facilities that
fail to "graduate" from the SFF program are being terminated from
the Medicare program and that such terminations, and the facility
closures that frequently result, are harmful to residents. While
recognizing that closures may sometimes be necessary, the Center
endorses a more comprehensive approach to enforcement of nursing
home standards that relies less on closure and more on intermediate
sanctions. As the 1987 Nursing Home Reform Law mandates, the Center
supports a quicker, more effective use of the full range of
intermediate remedies so that providers, not residents, are
sanctioned.
Resources
CMS's news release, "CMS
Publishes National List of Poor-Performing Nursing Homes, Key Tool
for Families Seeking Quality Care" (Nov. 29, 2007), http://www.cms.hhs.gov/apps/media/press/release.asp?Counter=2672&intNumPerPage=10&checkDate=&checkKey=&srchType=1&numDays=
3500&srchOpt=0&srchData=&srchOpt=0&srchData=&keywordType=All&chkNewsType=1%2C+2%2C+3%2C+4%2C+5&intPage=&showAll=&pYear=&year=&desc=&cboOrder=date
The list of 54 SFFs,
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/CertificationandComplianc/Downloads/SFFList.pdf
CMS, "Improvements to the
National Special Focus Facility (SFF) Program for Nursing Facilities
– Notice Requirements," S&C-08-02 (Nov. 2, 2007),
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/SurveyCertificationGenInfo/downloads/SCLetter08-02.pdf
CMS, "Improving
Enforcement via the Special Focus Facility Program for Nursing
Homes," S&C-05-13 (Dec. 16, 2004),
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/SurveyCertificationGenInfo/downloads/SCLetter05-13.pdf
Clark Kauffman, "Names of
care centers withheld from public, given to lobbyists," The Des
Moines Register (Dec. 5, 2007),
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2007712050373
Senator Obama's letter, is
co-signed by Senators Jeff Bingaman (D, NM), Dick Durbin (D, IL),
Tom Harkin (D, IA), Edward Kennedy (D, MA), Joseph Lieberman (I,
CT), Evan Bayh (D, IN), Bernard Sanders (I, VT), and Ron Wyden (D,
OR),
http://obama.senate.gov/press/071212-obama_harkin_ke/
The Nursing Home Reform Law,
42 U.S.C. §§1395i-3(a)-(h),
1396r(a)-(h), Medicare and Medicaid, respectively. The enforcement
provisions are at 42 U.S.C. §§1395i-3(h), 1396r(h).
"Nursing Home Quality and
Transparency Act"
(Introduced in Senate), S 2480 IS. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:S.2480:
|