|
Apparently not all cost overruns are created equal. Case in point:
the well-documented, $150 billion subsidies being paid to private
Medicare plans – about 12% more than would be due for enrollees in
the regular Medicare program. The Senate failed to follow the lead
of the House of Representatives to protect the integrity and
stability of the Medicare program by cutting these subsidies. The
Administration threatened to veto any bill that even trimmed the
subsidies, under the guise of being against legislation that reduces
choice and access for Medicare beneficiaries.
Thus the
subsidies continue for another year, notwithstanding repeated
studies and little debate about their wastefulness. (See, "Two
Insurers Increase Bet on Medicare," Milt Freudenheim, NY Times,
12/5/2007.) Even with the subsidies, many private Medicare plans are
reducing coverage and adding to patient cost-sharing. Meanwhile, all
beneficiaries and taxpayers bear the financial burden of maintaining
the extravagant overpayments. Unless action is taken, private
Medicare plans will collect a total of $150 billion in subsidies,
while doctors who care for Medicare patients face a 10% cut in
payments.
The
private plan overpayments affect all Medicare beneficiaries. They
lead to increases in Part B premiums and encourage plan
proliferation and marketing abuses by companies looking to benefit
from the robust Medicare payments. These overpayments affect all
Americans by weakening the financial stability of the Medicare
program and by increasing federal expenditures. Even a recent study
issued by a for-profit insurance industry group shows that, at best,
private Medicare plans spend 300-400% more on administration than
traditional Medicare.[1]
The
lavish subsidies to private plans continue at the same time that we
are repeatedly warned, in solemn tones, that "we just can’t afford
Medicare" for our ever-increasing aging population. The
Administration rails at fraud, waste and abuse throughout the
federal government, yet the President and a powerful minority in the
Senate were able to block action to reduce the billions of dollars
in overpayments to corporate Medicare. As a result, taxpayers, most
people with Medicare, and doctors are losers. Private corporations
win – big time.
Some
claim that the 20% of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in private
plans will lose benefits and oversight if payments to Medicare
Advantage plans are cut. But many private plans are cutting
benefits and passing along additional costs to Medicare
beneficiaries anyway – even though they continue to be paid far more
than traditional Medicare. Further, there is no evidence that
private Medicare plans provide more care coordination than is
available in traditional Medicare. In fact, beneficiaries who choose
an MA plan are likely to find that it limits the doctors and other
healthcare providers they can use. The traditional program allows
them freedom of choice among almost all providers - that's the kind
of choice that matters to people.
Private
plans do not provide the flexibility or stability of the traditional
Medicare program, which covers 80% of all beneficiaries, and they
should not be paid more than traditional Medicare. The overpayments
to private Medicare plans look, smell, and act like a boondoggle.
As Chico Marx said in Duck Soup, "Who you gonna believe, me or your
own eyes?"
[1] Council for
Affordable health Insurance, Medicare’s Hidden
Administrative Costs: A Comparison of Medicare and the
Private Sector (Based in Part on a Technical Paper by Mark
Litow of Milliman, Inc.), Merrill Matthews, Ph.D. January
10, 2006.
|