medicareadvocacy.org

Center for Medicare Advocacy, Inc.

Innovative Legal and Technical Consulting

 

Advancing fair access to Medicare and health care


 
Home l About Us l Contact Us l Site Search l Español l Resources l Donate             

www.MedicareWorks.org   

   

Support Real Reform Now  


  

ALJ/MAC Decision Database


 

THE CENTER FOR MEDICARE ADVOCACY IN THE NEWS, 2008
 

December 2008
  • Click here http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/ to read “Center For Medicare Advocacy Issues New Recommendations For Real Reforms To Help Medicare Beneficiaries And Taxpayers” from Medical News Today on December 23. According to the piece, the Center for Medicare Advocacy released a report detailing specific methods for keeping Medicare a vital, efficient and cost effective public program. The Center's report, Options for Real Medicare Reform, offers specific suggestions for improving the program and can be found at http://www.medicareadvocacy.org/Reform_08_12.18.OptionsforRealReform.pdf.
     
  • Click here http://www.elderlawanswers.com/ to read “Five-Star Rating System for Nursing Homes Arrives, for Better or for Worse” a December 20 article from Elder Law Answers.  According to the article, when the rating system was announced earlier this year, Toby Edelman, senior policy attorney with the Center for Medicare Advocacy, said that two of three criteria CMS uses for the ratings -- staffing data and quality measures -- are "self-reported by nursing facilities and are inaccurate." Edelman said, "Relying on nursing homes to describe accurately how well they are doing . . . just doesn't make sense."
     
  • Click here http://www.desmoinesregister.com/ to read “Iowa Veterans Home given poor marks” a December 18 article from the Des Moines Register.  According to the article, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services just launched a new system of Web-based nursing home rankings. The methodology behind those rankings is being questioned by both the nursing home industry and advocates for the elderly.  Toby Edelman, senior policy attorney at the Center for Medicare Advocacy, said the manner in which staffing levels are calculated can produce misleading scores. "I think a lot of facilities are going to have five stars for staffing that absolutely don't deserve them," she said. "I'm glad they're trying to give out more information, but I don't know that taking information that is not that good, and assigning it stars, is going to make it more useful - and it could be misleading people."
     
  • Click here http://thehill.com/ to read “Advocates hope Obama shifts from private Medicare plans” a December 5 article from The Hill.  According to the article, advocates for the elderly are expecting the incoming Obama administration to be more favorable to the traditional Medicare program, and to move away from the private insurers embraced by the current administration. “They’ve been running Medicare as a program for insurance companies,” said Vicki Gottlich, a senior policy attorney at the Center for Medicare Advocacy.
     
  • Click here to read "For Your Benefit: Picking the wrong Medicare drug option can be costly" a December 2 Wall Street Journal article that provides tips for choosing a part D plan.  Medicare beneficiaries should look at factors in addition to premiums, such as deductibles, co-payments, and which drugs are covered.  They "have to be very wise shoppers. Don't assume a drug will be covered this year," says Judith Stein, executive director of the Center for Medicare Advocacy.  The article also advises Medicare beneficiaries to enroll in a plan as soon as they are eligible, determine the best type of coverage, navigate the coverage gap, and get help from advocates, family, and friends.

November 2008

  • Click here to read "consumers Face Confusion When Picking Health Plans", a November 25 article in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.  According to the piece, Medicare enrollment periods are confusing, and consumers need to be careful. 
    Judith Stein, executive director of the Center for Medicare Advocacy, said "People need to make a choice every year because the plan they're on this year may well not be best for next year," Stein said. Moreover, different plans can cover different treatments and drugs, and need to be examined before they are picked. "You cannot just choose on the basis of premium," she said.
     
  • Click here to read "Medicare Rx Increases; Sorting Out Part D" a November 21 article from The Ledger.  According to the piece, Medicare enrollees should be particularly careful this year when choosing a Part D plan. "We're seeing massive changes this year," said Vicki Gottlich, a senior policy attorney for the Center for Medicare Advocacy, to the Orlando Sentinel. "Not only are premiums going up substantially, but we're seeing huge increases in cost sharing and new ways in which drug plans are going to hit people with costs. People really need to be careful."
     
  • Click here to read "Now's the time to sign up for Medicare Part D" a November 20 San Antonio Express News article. The article describes the current enrollment period for Medicare Part D and some of the changes that plans will undergo in 2009.  Judith Stein of the Center for Medicare Advocacy says that the premium on most plans is going up and that Medicare beneficiaries are likely to note that different drugs are covered. The article offers resources for Medicare recipients who need assistance with finding the plan that best meets their needs.
     
  • Click here to read "Medicare Part D Enrollment questions and answers" a November 14 Chicago Tribune article (it also appeared in the Orlando Sentinel). The article answers questions about Medicare Part D including eligibility and coverage requirements, and advice for comparing different drug plans. The Center for Medicare Advocacy's Vicki Gottlich says, "We're seeing massive changes this year -- not only are premiums going up substantially, but we're seeing huge increases in cost-sharing and new ways in which drug plans are going to hit people with costs. People really need to be careful."
     

  • Click here to read "The Breakdown: It's time to get started in choosing a Medicare plan" a November 14 Sun-Sentinel article. The article includes a few quick tips for Medicare recipients in South Florida who are going to enroll or change their Medicare Part D coverage. The Center for Medicare Advocacy is included as a resource for general help and advice on Medicare Part D.  
     

  • Click here to read "Medicare Moves" a November 14 Wall Street Journal article. The article describes various types of Medicare coverage and explains that Medicare Part D has a wide array of plans to choose from, making it difficult to navigate. "It's like comparing apples to oranges to kiwis," says Judith Stein, executive director of the Center for Medicare Advocacy.
     

  • Click here to read "Health plan options can be confusing" a November 12 Associated Press article. According to the piece, millions of people are receiving letters in the mail notifying them of the open enrollment period for their health-care plans, but the letter may not be easy to understand since health information is often presented in an unclear way, leaving consumers confused. Judith Stein, executive director of the nonprofit Center for Medicare Advocacy, said seniors using the government program need to make sure they understand their choices, especially for Medicare's Part D prescription drug program and for Medicare Advantage plans, which are run by private insurance companies as part of Medicare.  "People need to make a choice every year because the plan they're on this year may well not be best for next year," Stein said. Moreover, different plans can cover different treatments and drugs, and need to be examined before they are picked. "You cannot just choose on the basis of premium," she said.
     
  • Click here to read "Medicare enrollment set to start" a November 11 Ironton Tribune article. The article says, "According to the Center for Medicare Advocacy, Inc. Web site, people on the Part D plan, which is through private insurance and not Medicaid itself, will see a $20 increase in their deductible in 2009, with the plan going from $275 to $295. Then Medicare pays 75 percent of the next $2,405 worth of drugs. After that comes the "donut hole" — the threshold when the senior has to pay for 100 percent of the next $3,453.75 out of their own pockets."
     
  • Click here to read "Your guide to Medicare; enrollment in health, prescription drug plans runs from November 15 to December 31" a November 9 Sun-Sentinel article. The article describes the importance of choosing an affordable plan and includes an extensive guide of prescription drug and health plans available to Medicare recipients in South Florida. According to the article, some plans are changing formularies - lists of drugs they cover. "Seniors who don't check may choose a plan that, on Jan. 1, no longer covers a drug they take," said Center for Medicare Advocacy attorney Vicki Gottlich.
  • Click here to read "Tips for choosing a plan" a November 9 article from the South Florida Sun Sentinel.  The piece advises people choosing a Medicare plan to study whether prescription drug coverage works for them.  For advice on choosing a plan, seniors and disabled people can contact the Center for Medicare Advocacy.
     
  • Click here to read "Time to Review Seniors' Drug Options" a November 9 Wall Street Journal article focused on the Medicare enrollment period. According to the article, Medicare beneficiaries may be better off shopping around this year for prescription-drug plans.  Seniors who are considering Medicare's private health plans should know that the traditional Medicare program offers access to most doctors and hospitals.  In addition, according to the Center for Medicare Advocacy's executive director Judith Stein, "The widest choice is in the Medicare program.  When people travel and become ill, they are often taken aback by the limitations" with so-called Medicare Advantage plans.

October 2008

  • Click here to read "Wasteful Subsidies" a letter to the editor published in the October 27 Hartford Courant.  Medicare subsidies to private plans are wasted funds, according to Matthew Shepard, the Center for Medicare Advocacy's communications coordinator. He argues that traditional Medicare operates for less than Medicare private plans, and even if subsidies let private plans offer "added" benefits, many of these are designed to attract younger, healthier beneficiaries.  When they leave traditional Medicare, it skews the actuarial pool, leaving the poorest and sickest beneficiaries in traditional Medicare. The result: The traditional program will be overloaded with the costliest beneficiaries. When this happens, costs for Medicare go up and cries for cuts increase. These wasteful subsidies are one more attempt to dismantle a program that has been a success for more than 40 years.
     
  • Click here to read "Health Matters: Navigating a Path Around Medicare's 'Doughnut Hole'" from the October 18 Wall Street Journal. The article describes Medicare Part D's doughnut hole or coverage gap. The prescription plan covers medication costs up to a total of $2,510, after which a beneficiary is expected to cover the next $3,216 in costs before the plan once again covers most of the beneficiary's expenditures. As a result, some beneficiaries with chronic illnesses who cannot afford to pay full retail price for their medications stop taking them when they reach the doughnut hole. According to the article, with Medicare's open-enrollment period starting Nov. 15, it's time for people on Medicare to examine their options and ways to sidestep the doughnut hole.  "You need to do the math," says Center for Medicare Advocacy attorney Vicki Gottlich.  That includes estimating your drug expenses for next year, understanding how the doughnut hole works, and identifying ways to minimize out-of-pocket expenses.
     
  • Click here to read "No more free lunches from Medicare marketers" from the October 12 Syracuse Post-Standard. According to the article, the government has imposed new marketing restrictions on private health plans in response to widespread complaints about their deceptive and aggressive sales tactics. The new rules prohibit telemarketing and other unsolicited sales contacts, and they ban some financial incentives. Center for Medicare Advocacy attorney Vicki Gottlich doubts the new rules will make much difference because some of the new provisions are stricter versions of rules that were already in place but often ignored by health plans, and health plans are already trying to figure out how to get around the new rules.
     
  • Click here to read Saul Friedman's October 11 Gray Matters column in Newsday "Elders' self-interest is to vote for Obama."  Friedman says it is in everyone's self-interest to protect Medicare and Social Security. He believes that Barack Obama would support both programs as president, while John McCain would not.   He cites the Center for Medicare Advocacy as saying, "Medicare has kept millions of older people out of poverty, relieved children from worrying about paying for the care of their elders and helped increase life expectancy of people at age 65."
     
  • Click here to read "Medicare Won't Pay for Hospital-Care Blunders," an October 7th Bloomberg.com article. The piece focuses on a new Medicare policy which will cut payments to hospitals for medical mistakes in the hopes of improving quality of care. However, some patient advocates think denying payments may hurt patients and lead to billing disputes between them, hospitals and Medicare. According to Alfred Chiplin, a senior attorney for the Center for Medicare Advocacy, "Beneficiaries who fit certain illness profiles will not get services."

August 2008

  • Click here to read "Watchdog group says Medicare overpaying nursing homes by $1.5 billion", an August 30 article form the Naples Daily News.  The article describes planned overpayments to nursing homes in 2009, and quotes Center attorney Toby Edelman, who says "The windfall to skilled nursing facilities comes with no strings attached and there is no reason to believe this windfall will help improve the quality of care or quality of life for nursing home residents."
     

  • Click here to read "Nursing Home Industry To Receive $1.5 Billion Overpayment In 2009" by Center attorney Toby Edelman.  The August 29 piece appearing from Medical News today outlines overpayments that the Medicare agency will knowingly pay skilled nursing facilities in 2009.
     

  • Click here to read "Nursing Homes to Get Sprinklers `Years' Late" an August 26 article from Bloomberg News.  The article quotes Center attorney Toby Edelman on the need to continue use of other devices even after sprinklers are finally installed in facilities, years later than they should have been.  "Smoke alarms and sprinklers serve different purposes,'' said Ms. Edelman, "You want redundant protections.''
     

  • Click here to read a copy of "Many Struggling With Health Plans" an August 24 letter to the editor of the Hartford Courant by Center Communications Coordinator Matthew Shepard.  The letter is in response to a piece by a beneficiary who was trapped in her private Medicare plan, and offers solutions to her problem.
     

  • Click here to read "New Rules Regarding final Days" a McClatchey Newspapers article by Mark Agee that appeared in the Hartford Courant on August 18, as well as in other papers (See August 1 Fort Worth Star Telegram as "Hospice patients have more control of their treatment under new regulations).  Center attorney Terry Berthelot is quoted on the improvements for hospice patients made by the first updates to the hospice regulations in 25 years, saying "These are simple changes that will make a big difference to patients at the end of their lives... Historically, doctors have been encouraged to back away from patients when they enter hospice, but this keeps familiar people involved," she said. "Plus, it's nice to have someone there who is not

    concerned with the hospice's bottom line."
     

  • Click here to read "Conn. Relying on Nursing Home Chains", an Associated Press article that appeared in the Hartford Courant and other papers on August 17.  Center attorney Toby Edelman is quoted on the effect that chains have on quality of care, saying "Ownership is certainly a factor in quality of

    care... They send a lot of money to their corporate offices... There can be a lot

    of distance between the owners and the facilities themselves. They're not on the ground."
     

  • Click here to read "Medicare premiums to rise for drug plans", a South Florida Sun-Sentinel article by Bob LaMendola from August 15.  In the article, Center attorney Vicki Gottlich discusses the rise in Part D premiums and other costs that don't get as much attention, saying "We still don't know how much more people are going to pay for their drugs... Even if the premium in the plan isn't going up and people are happy with everything, they should look at all the plans and see which one is best for them."

July 2008

  • Click here to read "Serious violations at homes spike" and "Fines sometimes go unpaid by nursing home" articles from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (from July 26 and 27, respectively). One article focuses on violations in nursing homes that result in injuries and risks to seniors across Wisconsin.  Toby Edelman comments on fines for nursing homes with violations, saying, "The fines are so trivial now in amount compared to the harm that has been done to the resident. It is just the cost of doing business for the industry." The other article focuses on how these fines often go unpaid. Edelman says that even when fines are levied, collection systems don't seem to work. "The fines get proposed and reduced and then they don't get paid and go uncollected."  The July 26 article also appeared on RedOrbit.com.
     
  • Click here to read "Thousands Lose Coverage When Program Dropped" a Mobile Register article from July 9th.  The piece summarizes the local effects of Congress' neglect to re-authorize the "Qualifying Individual Program" due to a tight Medicaid budget. Almost 16,000 Alabamians are being dropped from the program and will now have to pay their own premiums. The article quotes Center for Medicare Advocacy senior policy attorney, Patricia Nemore, who said Congress has always reauthorized the program in the past.  "It's obviously popular. Nobody wants to be the one who cuts this program out."
     
  • Click here to read "Nursing homes will now be rated," from the July 8 Pottstown Mercury.  The article focuses on the new rating system for nursing homes put forth by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that will allow potential residents and their families to comparison shop for the best home. The article cites a senior staff attorney at the Center for Medicare Advocacy who "warns consumers that this rating system is likely to be flawed if CMS relies on inspections and quality measures reported by the nursing homes themselves as complete data."
     
  • Click here to read "Medicare Mess" from the July 4 Virginian-Pilot. The article highlights the resistance many Medicare beneficiaries experience when trying to report billing mistakes. Often interpreted as reluctance on Medicare's part, it can be difficult to navigate through the network of Medicare representatives one can reach through 1-800-MEDICARE. The article quotes Judith Stein who says that this experience is "classic" and that she hears "all the time from people who have called the 1-800-MEDICARE number and are quite unsatisfied with the results."
     
  • Click here to read "Retire Smart" a Columbus Dispatch article from July 1 which lists health insurance possibilities for individuals in early retirement, including the continued coverage guaranteed by COBRA, individual policies, Medicaid, and Veterans Affairs. The article says that Medicare -- a proven, efficient way to deliver health-care services -- may be expanding its eligibility standards, which might help ease the program's solvency issues. Furthermore, Vicki Gottlich says, "It would take care of a large number of uninsured people."

June 2008

  • Click here to access "Settlement to Ease Drug Costs for Some on Medicare" by Robert Pear.  This New York Times article from June 19 discusses the recent settlement filing in the Center for Medicare Advocacy's Situ v. Leavitt lawsuit regarding dual eligibles' treatment under Medicare Part D.  the article quotes Center attorney Gill Deford, who says the settlement will "help hundreds of thousands of people a year get their prescription drugs more quickly, at nominal cost."

     

    The settlement filing was also reported by United Press International, the Hill, Medical News today, Long term Living Magazine, the Wichita Eagle, MedGuru (india), RedOrbit News, the Naples News, the Post Chronicle, lawyers and Settlements, Health News, Amed News and others.

     

  • Click here to read "U.S. Preps Nursing-Home Rating System", a June 19 article from the Wall Street Journal The article details the new 5-star rating system for skilled nursing facilities that the Bush administration has proposed to improve the quality of care in those facilities.  The article quotes Center attorney Toby Edelman, who expresses doubts about the system, saying several criteria "are self-reported by nursing facilities and are inaccurate." "Too often, nursing facilities report that residents are doing much better than they really are and that they have more staff than they really have," [s]he said. "Relying on nursing homes to describe accurately how well they are doing -- and reporting that information as fact -- just doesn't make sense."

    Ms. Edelman was also quoted on this issue in the Springfield News-Leader,
    , the Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, Medical News today, and Elder Law Answers.
     

  • Click here to read "Seniors, be wary of fraud", a June 23 article form the Greenwich Post.  The article discusses a Center client who was the target of Medicare Part D phone scam and urges caution for seniors. 
     

  • Click here to read "Seniors be wary of fraud" a June 19 Greenwich Post article that reminds seniors to be on the lookout for identity theft. The piece describes a fraudulent call in which a client of the Center for Medicare Advocacy was told that all Medicare beneficiaries were required by law to make a one-time $374 payment in order to have prescription drug coverage.
     

  • Click here to read "Washington state gives inspectors more tools, including power to halt nursing home's admissions to get problems fixed" a June 7 article from the Press Enterprise detailing Washington state's more stringent inspection system.  Center attorney Toby Edelman is quoted as saying "Most states defend the worst of the worst of their nursing homes," said Toby Edelman, senior policy lawyer at Washington, D.C.'s Center for Medicare Advocacy Inc., a consumer organization. "Washington has tough regulations and isn't afraid to use them."
     

  • Click here to read "Medicare premiums for drugs up 16%" an article from the June 7 Florida Times-Union. The piece describes new data showing that most seniors in Medicare's prescription program are paying considerably higher monthly premiums for coverage this year.  The article cites the Center for Medicare Advocacy as a resource for Medicare beneficiaries, saying, "Compare options: The Center for Medicare Advocacy states that all plans have different costs and benefits from year to year, so it is wise for consumers to compare options."
     
  • Click here to read "Casualties of Care" a June 7 article from the Press Enterprise explaining that many nursing home patients and family members say their complaints about caregivers are dismissed with little explanation or result in minimal punishment.  The article cites Center attorney Toby Edelman, who thinks that some inspectors are poorly trained and won't substantiate an offense unless they witness it.

     

  • Click here to read "Nursing home operators lose 93% of appeals: report", an article regarding the Center for Medicare Advocacy's recently released review of nursing home decisions made in 2007 by the Department of Health and Human Services' Departmental Appeals Board (DAB).  Center attorney Toby Edelman is quoted as saying "The study shows not only that problems in care are serious and that penalties are modest, but also that facilities choose to appeal these enforcement actions throughout he administrative appeals process. Almost always the facilities lose their cases."
     

  • Click here to read "Center for Medicare Advocacy Report Says HHS Weak on Enforcing Nursing Home Errors", another take on the Center's report, which focuses on the mild penalties and the need for beneficiary awareness.   Ms. Edelman is quoted as saying "Despite the serious deficiencies reflected by these cases, the federal enforcement response is usually modest, at best ... The federal government imposes only minor fines for these deficiencies."

    The Center's report is also cited in Nursing Homes Long term Care Management
    .

     

May 2008

  • Click here to read "Medicare supplier changes might confuse seniors" a May 23 article from the South Florida Sun Sentinel.  According to the article, A Medicare plan to slash about 30 percent off the price of home medical goods — including oxygen, diabetes supplies and walkers also may baffle some seniors and temporarily disrupt their care.  Center for Medicare Advocacy attorney Alfred Chiplin is quoted as saying "There will be some chaos initially...The people who use these items are often in crisis. They don't need chaos."  He goes on to say that the new system can work — if managed well.  "This is Medicare," he said, "people need to watch it carefully."
     
  • Click here to read "Health Premiums Rising For Seniors With Genworth Policies" a May 14 article from the Hartford Courant.  According to the article, some Medicare beneficiaries with Genworth policies will see their premiums rise by 30%. Judith Stein is quoted as saying that Genworth's repeated increases "will price many older and disabled people out of the Medigap market and into private Medicare Advantage plans without them necessarily knowing whether those plans will meet their needs."
     
  • Click here to read "Oregon docs shun Medicare patients" a May 4 article from the Sunday Oregonian.  According to the article, federal regulations base Medicare reimbursement on historical costs. Because Oregon has kept its health care costs relatively low, Medicare provides less money, and fewer Oregon physicians are accepting Medicare. The problem could be compounded in July, when a nationwide cut in Medicare funding is scheduled to kick in. "If the payment reduction goes through, that will be a huge problem nationally," said Judith Stein, executive director of the Center for Medicare Advocacy.
     
  • Click here to read "States Look to Rein In Private Medicare Plans" a May 5 article from the New York Times. According to the article, state officials will soon ask Congress for more power to regulate the marketing of private Medicare insurance plans to older Americans because they are still receiving complaints of high-pressure sales tactics that have led some beneficiaries to sign up for unsuitable policies.  Consumer groups support the request. "It's a good idea," said Vicki Gottlich, a lawyer at the Center for Medicare Advocacy. The piece was picked up by other outlets, as well.

April 2008

  • Click here to read "Seniors Legal Line" a column from the April 24 Pine Journal (a weekly Minnesota-based newspaper). The piece focuses on the fact that Medicare does not pay for long-term care in a nursing home. Typically, Medicare only pays for a short period of time, after which the nursing home resident pays or is eligible for Medical Assistance. The piece cites the Center for Medicare Advocacy to explain skilled nursing and skilled rehabilitation services.

     

  • Click here to read "Sharing the Medicare Burden" a letter to the editor that appeared in the Washington Times on April 28.  The letter, by Michael Rubin of the Center for Medicare Advocacy, says that only by investing in each other can we become a society that protects and cares for those who have come before us.  He says that Medicare beneficiaries have always shared part of the financial burden for health care, as required by the law, contrary to some misconceptions -- including those of the HHS Secretary's son. 
     

  • Click here to read "Gray Matters: President George W. Bush Wants to Cut Medicare", an article by Saul Friedman that appeared in Newsday on April 26.  The piece describes the insidiousness of the Medicare act of 2003, and how administration officials used it to try to dismantle the traditional Medicare program.  The Center for Medicare Advocacy's executive director, Judith Stein, is quoted throughout, defending traditional Medicare and explaining the damage recent legislation has done.
     

  • Click here to read "Medicare Patients Cut Back on Prescriptions" a WebMD article. The article says a new study shows that Medicare beneficiaries skip their medications to save money, despite being covered by the program's Part D prescription drug plan.  Researchers blame Part D's benefit structure, which requires patients to share some of the cost of their drugs with the government. Judith Stein says organizations like the Center for Medicare Advocacy, that are trying to educate seniors on Part D are stymied by the plan's complexity. "Really using and understanding Part D is beyond the resources of the few organizations that exist to teach and the tens of millions of beneficiaries who use it," Stein says.
     

  • Click here to read "Medicare Bill A Boost For All" a letter to the editor from Judith Stein, executive director of the Center for Medicare Advocacy, that appeared in the Hartford Courant on April 4.  Stein states that Rep. Linda Schofield's bill to increase Medicare Savings Program eligibility is good for people and the state's finances. According to Stein, the bill would allow more low-income people to get help paying for their medications and for Medicare premiums and co-insurance, while also obtaining federal funds to help Connecticut meet these needs.

March 2008

  • Click here to read "Nursing Homes Changes Sought: Democrats Propose Millions to Fund New Staffing Rules" an article that appeared in The Hartford Courant on March 27. In the piece, Toby Edelman, senior policy attorney at the Center for Medicare Advocacy, said setting staff-to-resident ratios is the best route to ensuring adequate care. Pouring more money into nursing homes without setting ratios doesn't work to increase staffing levels, she said.
     

  • Click here to read "Legislators want to add $9.5M for nursing home staff" an article that appeared in The New Haven Register on March 27.  The piece cites Toby Edelman who said higher staffing levels at nursing homes translates to better care. "Facilities with higher levels of staffing have fewer injuries, have less turnover of employees," Edelman said.
     

  • Click here to read "Dems hope to secure better nursing homes" an article that appeared in the Meriden Record-Journal on March 26.  According to the article, a proposed plan from Democrats in Connecticut would provide $9.5 million in fiscal year 2008-09 to raise the minimum staff-to-resident ratio in nursing homes.  The article cites Toby Edelman, a senior policy attorney for Center for Medicare Advocacy, saying that adequate nursing staff is critical to providing good care. "We need more staffing in nursing homes, and we believe this legislation is the best way to get there," Edelman said.
     

  • Click here to read "Democrats say their budget spends less than Rell's plan" an article that appeared in the Boston Globe on March 25.  According to the piece, Senator Max Baucus said that he wants to cut subsidies that are now going to private insurance companies that sell private Medicare plans.  Judy Stein said she welcomed Baucus's comments, adding such over-payments threaten the future of Medicare itself.

  • Click here to read "Baucus tackles cuts in subsidies for Medicare Advantage" an article that appeared in the Helena Independent Record on March 23.  According to the piece, Senator Max Baucus said that he wants to cut subsidies that are now going to private insurance companies that sell private Medicare plans.  Judy Stein said she welcomed Baucus' comments, adding such over-payments threaten the future of Medicare itself.
     

  • Click here to read "Understanding Medicare options" an article that appeared in The Forest Blade on March 19. The piece explains Medicare's many choices and plans for readers in East Georgia, and cites the Center for Medicare Advocacy as a resource for readers navigating the Medicare maze.
     

  • Click here to read "Gray Matters: Patients restrained, greed isn't" an article that appeared in Newsday on March 15.  According to the piece, "Although much of the money paid to nursing homes comes from Medicaid and Medicare, the government often has no idea where and to whom these proceeds go."  Friedman cites Toby Edelman of the Center for Medicare Advocacy, who points out that nursing homes owned by Manor Care Inc., the nation's largest nursing homes chain, were among the facilities recently cited as deficient by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. In December, Manor Care was acquired by the Carlyle Group for $6.3 billion. Manor Care's former chief executive got as much as $186 million when his company was sold. According to Edelman, "Manor Care's 278 nursing homes could hire an additional 5,346 certified nurse aides or an additional 2,198 registered nurses [with that money]. Like all nursing home chains, most of Manor Care's revenues come from Medicare and Medicaid. How should our public dollars be spent? On one man's windfall, or certified nursing assistants and registered nurses in nursing homes?"
     

  • Click here to read "Extension Medicare program educates seniors" an article that appeared in the North Platte Telegraph on March 10. The piece focuses on a local program to help seniors understand the various options under Medicare Part D.  It cites the Center for Medicare Advocacy Web site as a source for information about the 2003 Medicare Reform Act. The article says the Act restructured the Medicare program and provided Medicare beneficiaries with some limited assistance paying for prescription drugs.
     

  • Click here to read "For Medicare, 'modernization' means 'destruction'" a commentary by Judith Stein that appeared on Neiman Watchdog on March 10.  According to Stein, a critical question that reporters must consider is, "Will we keep giving away public money to private industry rather than toward necessary health care for older and disabled people?"  Stein says that little has been written in the mainstream media about the Administration's persistent, remarkably successful effort to privatize Medicare. She says this story should be reported because traditional Medicare is almost universally cherished by Americans of all ages, on a level with Social Security.  In addition, the 2003 Medicare "Modernization" law was a major step toward the destruction of traditional Medicare; the 2003 law created an exclusively private prescription drug program, dramatically expanded the role of private Medicare plans, and authorized hundreds of billions of dollars to implement this move toward privatizing Medicare.

  • Click here to read "Low Risk, Heavy Drugs; State's Nursing Homes Might be Overusing Antipsychotics" an article that appeared in the Hartford Courant on March 2.  The piece describes how Connecticut's nursing homes dole out antipsychotic drugs to residents who do not have psychotic disorders at one of the highest rates in the country.  Toby Edelman of the Center for Medicare Advocacy is cited in the article, saying that in the 20 years since the Nursing Home Reform Act of 1987 (which mandates that residents be free from "chemical restraints" imposed for the purposes of discipline or convenience) was passed, the industry has focused more on reducing the prevalence of physical restraints than on limiting chemical restraints.  A high prevalence of antipsychotic use in a nursing home can be an indicator of inadequate staffing.
     

  • Click here to read "Gray Matters: Federal health programs for the poorest elderly" an article that appeared in Newsday on March 1. The piece says that millions of older Americans are truly and desperately poor.  Many need extra help because of the higher costs for Medicare, and this column explores some special programs for the lowest-income beneficiaries.  Friedman lists the programs and their eligibility levels, citing the Center for Medicare Advocacy as the source for his information.

February 2008

  • Click here to read "Gray Matters: Federal health programs for the poorest elderly" by Saul Friedman, from Newsday on February 29.   The article describes the impoverished conditions that afflict many of our nation's elders, and details programs that can help with health care costs, using information supplied by the Center for Medicare Advocacy.
     

  • Click here to read "Clauses in nursing home agreements may violate the law" an article that appeared in the Kansas City Star on February 2. The piece describes a new study which raised questions about how some nursing homes operate.  The article says elderly consumers and their families in Missouri should be wary when signing long and often complex nursing home agreements.  Toby Edelman of the Center for Medicare Advocacy is cited in the article, saying similar studies in other states also show "ongoing concerns" with nursing home agreements.
     

  • Click here to read "Old story: Hoping to age in place" an article that appeared in the Chicago Sun Times on February 1.  The piece focuses on the dilemma of the "Sandwich Generation:" adult children struggling to maintain their own homes and lives while helping their parents live out their lives at home, rather than in managed care.  The article says that for people searching for how best to approach helping their parents age well, or for those approaching their senior years and wanting to plan, Judith Stein of the Center for Medicare Advocacy, suggests seeking assistance from a qualified elder law attorney.  She says, "The National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys is a good source." Elder care attorneys are familiar with Medicare and Medicaid rules and can guide caregivers through other financial options such as long-term care insurance and reverse mortgages.

January 2008

  • Click here to read "Mayo in Rochester unlikely to limit Medicare patients" an article that appeared in the Post Bulletin (of Rochester, Minnesota) on January 25.  According to the article, the Mayo Clinic in Arizona has moved to limit care for Medicare patients, leading to worries that other major health providers could follow suit.  Mayo in Arizona also stopped taking new Medicare Advantage Plan patients January 1, although it will continue seeing established MAP patients. The article cites Vicki Gottlich of the Center for Medicare Advocacy saying that many major medical systems, including Johns Hopkins and Sloan Kettering either limit patients in Medicare Advantage plans or do not accept them at all.
     

  • Click here to read "Medicare: Understand your options" an article that appeared in the Mobile Register on January 7. The piece describes how Medicare beneficiaries should learn as much as possible about the different plan options before making a commitment. The piece says that according to the Center for Medicare Advocacy, those enrolled in private fee-for-service plans have sometimes faced difficulties in finding doctors who would treat them.

 
 


All information is copyright © Center for Medicare Advocacy, Inc.
Full Notice of Copyright and Legal Advice