|
Whether federal law and policies are preventing nursing home
residents from getting the pain medications they need has become a
major concern. In May 2009, the Milwaukee Office of the Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA) received a tip that PharMerica, a
provider of pharmacy services to nursing facilities, was delivering
controlled substances, including Fentanyl and OxyContin, to nursing
homes without appropriate prescriptions, in violation of the
Controlled Substances Act (CSA).[1]
In late July 2009, the DEA searched a PharMerica office and six
nursing homes in Wisconsin.[2]
Controversy about DEA
raids in Wisconsin, Ohio, Michigan, and Virginia has now moved to
Washington, D.C., where two nursing home trade associations, the
American Medical Directors Association, and the "Quality Care
Coalition for Patients in Pain (QCCPP)," a new coalition formed by
the American Society of Consultant Pharmacists,[3]
are asking Congress to amend the CSA to conform to current practice
in nursing homes. The trade associations and coalition argue that
obtaining certain controlled drugs based on facility-initiated
"chart orders" (described below) is a routine nursing home practice
for providing medications to residents. Without a change in the law
condoning the long-time industry practice, they argue, residents in
nursing homes will be denied timely access to pain medication.
The United States
Department of Justice has rejected industry efforts. Unfortunately,
the debate has ignored the issue that is most crucial to
beneficiaries - a requirement of the federal Nursing Home Reform Law
that physicians be available 24 hours a day for residents. From
beneficiaries' perspective the issue is not whether residents
receive the pain medication they need – the answer to that must, of
course, be yes – but whether residents' care will be properly
overseen by physicians, as required by the Nursing Home Reform Law.
The Laws
The CSA requires that an
authorized or DEA-registered prescriber write and sign prescriptions
for all controlled substances,[4]
including many pain medications commonly received by nursing home
residents. The DEA, which enforces the CSA, allows a prescriber to
fax an order for a nursing home resident, but it prohibits oral
orders except in narrowly defined circumstances.
Since its October 1990
effective date, the Nursing Home Reform Law has required that the
care of each resident be under the supervision of a physician and
that each nursing facility "provide for having a physician available
to furnish necessary medical care in case of an emergency."[5]
Regulations addressing Physician Services reiterate the statutory
requirement for emergency physician availability and require that
"(1) The medical care of each resident is supervised by a physician;
and (2) Another physician supervises the medical care of residents
when their attending physician is unavailable."[6]
Current Practice in
Nursing Homes
Many nursing homes use
"chart orders" for prescriptions, including controlled substances.
As described by the American Association of Homes and Services for
the Aging (AAHSA), the national trade association of not-for-profit
facilities, a nursing home nurse who assesses a resident's changed
condition may contact the physician by phone to describe the
resident's symptoms and vital signs. If the physician gives the
nurse a "verbal" (i.e., oral) order for a new drug or a changed
drug, the nurse records the order in the resident's chart – a
"chart" order – and then faxes the chart order to the pharmacy for
dispensing.
The DEA, however, does
not consider the nursing home nurse an agent of the physician and
requires the physician to initiate prescriptions for all controlled
substances.
Nursing Home Industry
Arguments
The nursing home industry
argues in three different analyses that current nursing home
practice should be recognized by the DEA and not sanctioned, or that
Congress should amend the CSA to allow the practice of chart orders
for controlled substances. None of the industry analyses refers to
requirements of the Nursing Home Reform Law.
AAHSA argues that chart
orders should be recognized for several reasons. First, the
association contends that facilities receive residents "at all hours
of the night and day, and on weekends. These patients are often
coming directly from hospitals and are in dire need of pain
medication."[7]
Second, it contends that more than 40% of physicians who see
residents "work out of their vehicles and do not have an established
office or staff." Finally, delaying prescriptions for residents can
cause residents distress and subject the facility to "regulatory
enforcement rules."
A joint brief by the
American Health Care Association (AHCA) and the American Medical
Directors Association (AMDA) describes "verbal orders," which the
associations define as orders "that are not written directly by
practitioners," as necessary "because – among other reasons –
physicians generally are only present in the facility intermittently
and may not be readily available to receive and discuss information
or give orders directly in a timely fashion."[8]
The Issue Brief recommends that each nursing facility should:
-
"Educate its staff
and practitioners about the implications of writing orders on
the [Physician's order sheet], and related documentation
guidelines;"
-
"Have a policy and/or
protocol governing written orders on the POS, including
circumstances for writing verbal orders;"
-
"Be aware of how its
physician order sheet (POS) is used;"
-
"Institute measures
that seek to reduce errors related to verbal orders;"
-
"Have a clear and
thoughtful approach to developing and using preauthorized
orders;" and
-
"Medical directors
should review issues related to verbal orders with their
attending physicians."
The QCCPP Issue Brief
calls on Congress to amend the CSA to (1) clarify that a nursing
home nurse "is an agent of the prescriber," (2) define chart orders
as valid prescription orders, and (3) "ensure that pharmacists
cannot be penalized for preparing prescription drug orders for the
review and signature of a practitioner for long-term care
residents."[9]
Senate Letter
On October 19, 2009,
Senators Herb Kohl (D, WI) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D, RI) wrote to
U.S. Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr. about the DEA issue,
including draft legislation (the "Long-Term Care Patients' Access to
Medically Necessary Controlled Substances Act of 2009") that would
deem the nursing home's licensed nurse to be the medical
practitioner's agent and would make chart orders legal.[10]
Department of Justice
Response
In December 2, 2009
letters to the Senators, Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich
reported that pharmacists' complaints to the DEA had prompted the
recent investigations.[11]
Mr. Weich shared the Senators' concern in assuring the health and
welfare of residents and argued that business practices like chart
orders "trivialize the doctor-patient relationship and weaken the
quality of care for the frail and infirm," while increasing the risk
of diversion of controlled drugs.[12]
Mr. Weich defended the DEA's practices in enforcing the CSA and
rejected the Senators' position that the CSA does not recognize
current practices in long-term care facilities:
The assumption underlying
this statement appears to be that because some Long-Term Care
Facilities have established improper patterns of behavior relating
to the prescribing of controlled substances (and which lack
appropriate involvement by a properly licensed practitioner), this
conduct should be declared permissible going forward.
He described two existing
accommodations in federal regulations implementing the CSA that
recognize the "unique characteristics" of nursing homes. The
regulations permit nursing homes to use automatic dispensing
machines to dispense controlled drugs to residents and they allow
pharmacists to dispense prescriptions for nursing home residents
when they receive faxed prescriptions.
Beneficiary
Perspective
Advocates for residents
recognize that residents' pain must always be promptly and
thoroughly addressed. They point out that the under-treatment of
residents' pain is, in fact, a serious and long-standing problem.
But the industry's approach seems misguided. If a resident becomes
so suddenly and seriously ill that he or she urgently requires pain
medication at the level of a controlled substance, he or she is also
likely to need immediate medical attention. Getting a resident pain
medication, but no medical care, may not solve the resident's
underlying medical problem.
Moreover, the Nursing
Home Reform Law requires that physicians be available in emergencies
and to oversee residents' medical care 24 hours a day. Enforcing
the Reform Law would reduce, if not eliminate, the problem of
residents failing to get the physician-prescribed pain medication
they need.
[1] 21 U.S.C. §801
et seq (Title II of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention
and Control Act of 1970); 21 C.F.R. §§1306.01-.27.
[3] QCCPP was
formed by the American Society of Consultant Pharmacists "to
ensure that nursing home residents, hospice patients and
others have access to appropriate and timely pain medication
by (1) advocating to eliminate barriers to access resulting
from laws, regulations and policies governing the
prescribing and dispensing of controlled substances; (2)
promoting compliance and best practices by educating
providers, prescribers, consumers and their caregivers about
appropriate prescribing and dispensing practices. Changing
the Controlled Substances Act will take sustained effort
from QCCPP, requiring a multi-stakeholder,
multi-disciplinary group. QCCPP has been structured to
ensure broad participation. Membership is open to all
individuals as well as for-profit and not-for-profit
organizations and entities."
http://ascp.com/advocacy/qccpp/index.cfm.
[5] 42 U.S.C.
§§139i-3(b)(6)(A), (B), 1396r(b)(6)(A), (B), Medicare and
Medicaid, respectively.
[8] AHCA/AMDA
"Physician Order Sheet & Verbal Orders White Paper" (Nov.
17, 2009),
[12] Frequent
articles describe drug diversions of controlled substances
by nursing home staff. See, e.g., Brian D.
Bridgefore, "Portage woman charged with a drug felony,"
News Republic (Jan. 20, 2010) (Wisconsin worker
criminally charged with removing painkilling patch
containing fentanyl from resident),
http://www.wiscnews.com/util/print.php?pub=bnr&ntid=469672&ref=%2Fbnr%2Fnews%2F469672;
"Burlington nurse loses license after stealing drugs,"
The Journal Times (Jan. 20, 2010) (registered nurse in
Wisconsin stole narcotic pain medicine Oxycodone from a
resident, lost her license); Bill Devlin, "Police: Woman
stole painkilling patches from patients," Phillyburbs
(Jan. 13, 2010) (Pennsylvania aide arrested for stealing
pain medication patches containing fentanyl from
residents),
http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/news_details/article/92/2010/january/13/police-woman-stole-painkilling-patches-from-patients.html
|