|
For further information,
follow one of the links below or scroll down the page.
A QUICK SCREEN TO AID IN
IDENTIFYING COVERABLE CASES
Medicare Part A provides payment for post-hospital care in skilled nursing
facilities (SNFs) for up to 100 days during each spell of illness. A
“spell of illness” begins on the first day a patient receives Medicare-covered
inpatient hospital or skilled nursing facility care and ends when the patient
has spent 60 consecutive days outside the institution, or remains in the
institution but does not receive Medicare-coverable care for 60 consecutive
days.
If Medicare coverage requirements are met, the patient is entitled to full
coverage of the first 20 days of SNF care. From the 21st through the 100th
day, Medicare pays for all covered services except for a daily co-insurance
amount; which is adjusted annually. For 2007, the
co-insurance for days 21-100 is $124.00/day.
Skilled nursing facility coverage includes the services generally available in a
SNF: nursing care provided by registered professional nurses, bed and board,
physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, social services,
medications, supplies, equipment, and other services necessary to the health of
the patient.
Unfair denials
of Medicare coverage for skilled nursing facility care occur with
surprising frequency. Because Medicare uses rules and procedures which may
improperly restrict coverage, patients are sometimes required to pay for care
which should be covered by Medicare.
Medicare should pay for skilled
nursing facility care if:
-
The patient was
hospitalized for at least three days and was admitted to the SNF
within 30 days of hospital discharge. (In unusual cases,
it can be more than 30 days.)
-
A physician
certifies that the patient needs SNF care.
-
The beneficiary requires skilled
nursing or skilled rehabilitation services, or both, on a daily
basis. Skilled nursing and skilled rehabilitation services
are those which require the skills of technical or professional
personnel such as nurses, physical therapists, and occupational
therapists. In order to be deemed skilled, the service
must be so inherently complex that it can be safely and
effectively performed only by, or under the supervision of,
professional or technical personnel.
-
The skilled
nursing facility is a Medicare certified facility.
OTHER IMPORTANT POINTS
-
The
restoration potential of the patient is not the deciding factor in
determining whether skilled services are needed.
-
The
management of a plan involving only a variety of “custodial” personal care
services is skilled when, in light of the patient’s condition, the aggregate
of those services requires the involvement of skilled personnel.
-
The
requirement that a patient receive “daily” skilled services will be met if
skilled rehabilitation services are provided five days per week.
-
Examples of skilled services:
-
Overall management and
evaluation of care plan;
-
Observation and assessment of the patient’s changing condition;
-
Levin tube and gastrostomy feedings;
-
Ongoing assessment of rehabilitation needs and potential;
-
Therapeutic exercises or activities;
-
Gait evaluation and training.
-
The doctor is the patient’s most
important ally. If it appears that Medicare coverage will be denied,
ask the doctor to help demonstrate that the standards described above are
met.
-
If the nursing home issues a
notice saying Medicare coverage is not available and the patient seems to
satisfy the criteria above, ask the nursing home to submit a claim for a
formal Medicare coverage determination. The nursing home must submit a
claim if the patient or representative requests it; the patient is not
required to pay until he/she receives a formal determination from Medicare.
-
Don’t be satisfied with a Medicare determination unreasonably limiting
coverage; appeal for the benefits the patient deserves. It will take
some time, but appeals are often successful.
What to do when Medicare denies coverage for skilled nursing facility care
-
If the
denial is oral (no written notice), call the Center for Medicare Advocacy
for free advice.
-
If you have received a written denial, ask the
nursing home to submit the claim to Medicare for a second formal opinion
from the Medicare “Contractor”. You do not have to pay the nursing
home until you receive Medicare’s determination.
-
If
coverage is still denied in Medicare’s determination, APPEAL. Call the
Center for Medicare Advocacy for legal help.
Download a Self-Help Packet here.
And please take a moment to
share your story with us.
IMPORTANT PROVISIONS REINSTATED IN MEDICARE
SKILLED NURSING FACILITY REGULATIONS
In July,1998 revisions were made to the federal regulations
which made significant changes to the Medicare skilled nursing facility
level-of-care requirements. The revisions created a lack of clarity about what
constitutes skilled nursing and, therefore, about a beneficiary's
ability to receive Medicare coverage for skilled nursing facility care. This
confusion was resolved, one year later, when the important provisions defining
skilled nursing were reinstated into the federal regulations. 64 FR 41670 (July
30, 1999).
The 1998 changes had eliminated "overall management and
evaluation of a patient's care plan, observation and
assessment of the patient's changing condition, and
patient education services@ from the list of examples of skilled nursing
services which, if delivered on a daily basis, qualify a patient for Medicare
skilled nursing facility (SNF) coverage. 42 CFR '409.33(a)(1)-(3). These
services are fundamental to basic nursing practice and, therefore, should have
remained as a basis for determining a skilled nursing facility level of care.
(See 42 CFR Section 409.32; The Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice, 1996,
page 5.) The changes resulted in the identification of only certain specific
examples of nursing care, such as Foley catheter changes and intravenous or
intramuscular injections, as skilled services which could trigger Medicare
coverage for SNF care.
On April 28, 1999 HCFA Administrator Nancy-Ann Min DeParle
responded to an inquiry regarding this issue from the Center for Medicare
Advocacy (click here to view letter).
Administrator DeParle confirmed that HCFA continued to consider these services
skilled nursing care. In her letter, which is available from the Center, Ms.
DeParle wrote:
...we did not intend that our deletion of care plan
management/evaluation, observation/assessment, and patient education
would indicate that we no longer regard these services as appropriate
examples of skilled care. Rather, we made this revision in the belief
that such services need no longer be separately identified in the
administrative criteria since they are already effectively captured by
the clinical proxies utilized in the [new] Resource Utilization Groups
[RUGS], version III [payment] system of resident classification used
under SNF PPS.
(Emphasis added.)
Fortunately for beneficiaries, these provisions were
reinstated in the federal regulations issued in July, 1999. In reinstating the
provisions the Secretary noted:
Our reason for deleting the explicit references in the
regulations to management and evaluation, observation and assessment, and
patient education was not that they no longer represented appropriate
examples of skilled care, but rather, because we believed that these
separate references were no longer necessary in view of the clinical
indicators that have been incorporated into the upper 26 RUG-III groups.
However, in order to avoid possible confusion on this point, we are
accepting the commenters= suggestion to reinstate these categories as
specific examples in the SNF level of care regulations. 64 FR 41670 (July
30, 1999).
The three reinstated regulation provisions incorporate some
of the most critical nursing activities for invoking Medicare coverage. They are
as follows:
1. Overall management and evaluation of an individual's
care plan ( 42 CFR 409.33(a)(1));
2. Observation and assessment of the patient's
changing condition. (This includes identifying and evaluating the patient's
need for modification of treatment or for additional medical procedures until
the condition stabilizes.) ( 42 CFR 409.33(a)(2));
3. Patient education services ( 42 CFR 409.33(a)(3 ) ).
Advocates should remember these important coverage rules and
the administration's commentary when seeking benefits
for skilled nursing facility patients in order to insure that they obtain the
Medicare coverage to which they are entitled. The regulations and related
commentary, quoted above, should be brought to the attention of hospital
discharge planners, SNF providers, fiscal intermediaries, administrative law
judges, and others interested in Medicare skilled nursing facility
determinations. This is particularly true when advocating on behalf of patients
whose need for daily skilled nursing services may not be identified through the
process of establishing a RUGS classification.
THE MEDICARE PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM
Payment System Prior to July, 1998: Retrospective and
Cost-Based
Until July, 1998, nursing homes used to be reimbursed for
care provided to Medicare Part A-covered residents residing in
Medicare-certified beds through a retrospective cost-based system. The rate
received by a nursing home for a Medicare covered resident was based on three
components:
Routine costs: These consisted of the services included in
the facility's daily charge;
Ancillary costs: These key charges were those that were
directly attributable to individual resident care needs, such as therapy,
drugs and lab charges. Physical therapy, for example, was covered separately
by Medicare based upon a determination regarding medical necessity. There
was, therefore, a fiscal incentive for nursing homes to provide such therapy
to Medicare Part A covered residents;
Capital costs: costs of land, buildings and equipment.
Prospective Payment System (PPS) Mandated as of July 1, 1998
The Balanced Budget Act mandated a prospective per diem rate
for the Medicare SNF benefit. All three components which comprised the previous
rate are folded into the new prospective rate. The prospective rate is based
upon a case-mix system, with the reimbursement premised upon measuring the type
and intensity of the care required by each resident and the amount of resources
which are utilized to provide the care required.
To arrive at this measure, a classification system based upon
resident acuity, called Resource Utilization Groups (RUGS-III), is used to place
each Medicare-coverable resident into one of 7 major classifications and then
into one of 44 categories. The classifications are mutually exclusive, meaning
that every resident can be placed into one classification and no resident fits
into more than one classification.
The process of placing residents into the RUGS-III
classifications requires accurate and comprehensive information-gathering about
a resident's characteristics and needs. This is a critical component of a RUGS
classification because the RUGS classification has implications for both
reimbursement and Medicare coverage.
Impact on Nursing Home Reimbursement
The RUGS classifications are hierarchical, with the higher
categories providing greater reimbursement. The prospective reimbursement rate
is being phased in over a three year transition period. Depending upon when a
facility's cost reporting period ends, the phase-in begins either beginning
October 1,1998 or January 1,1999. During the first year of implementation, the
old facility-specific rate accounts for 75% of a facility's
reimbursement with the prospective calculation accounting for 25% of a
facility's rate. In the second year of operation, these percentages change to
50% each and in the third and final transition year, the respective percentages
are 25% and 75%. By the fourth year, the entire reimbursement rate will be
prospectively determined.
The Seven Major RUGS Categories
The seven major RUGS categories, in hierarchical order based
upon intensity of resource utilization, are:
1. Rehabilitation (14 classifications)
2. Extensive Service (3 classifications)
3. Special Care (3 classifications)
4. Clinically Complex (6 classifications)
5. Impaired Cognition (4 classifications)
6. Behavior Only (4 classifications)
7. Decreased Physical Function (10 classifications)
There are 26 RUGS classifications within the first 4 major
categories. These convey a presumptive Medicare coverage status at this time.
The remaining 18 classifications are contained within the 3 lowest major RUGS
categories.
Impact on Medicare Coverage: A Presumption of Medicare
Coverage for "Upper 26"
The Health Care Financing Administration has announced that
residents who are classified in the top 26 classifications are presumed to
automatically meet the Medicare coverage criteria.
One might assume that a Medicare beneficiary who is
classified into one of the top 26 RUGS categories would have an easy time with
SNF placement. However, there appear to be barriers to SNF admission for some
Medicare beneficiaries in the top 26 RUGS. These barriers appear to be caused by
the high cost to SNFs of caring for certain groups of individuals seeking SNF
admission. The common characteristics shared by those experiencing increasing
difficulty gaining admission to SNFs include patients who meet the SNF coverage
criteria, but who also require :
Kidney dialysis, with round-trip ambulance
transportation to a dialysis center thee times a week;
Radiation therapy, with round trip ambulance
transportation;
Fitting of a prosthesis;
Certain types of chemotherapy or other
intravenous medications.
All of the costs of providing the services needed by those
groups are subsumed in a SNF's Medicare prospective per diem rate. Many SNFs
have informally communicated a reluctance to accept such individuals when
Medicare is the apparent payment source, because of the costs involved. As a
result, it appears that individuals who have these needs encounter difficulties
to obtaining SNF placement.
By What Standard Will Those Classified in the "Lowest 18" Be
Evaluated?
For residents who are classified in the lowest 18
classifications, no presumption of coverage will be applied. These residents
will have their care needs reviewed on a case-by-case basis for the purpose of
determining if Medicare coverage can be established. The Health Care Financing
Administration announced in promulgating the new Medicare skilled nursing
facility reimbursement regulations, that "existing administrative criteria@
should be used to evaluate whether or not a resident requires daily skilled
care, the legal standard for Medicare coverage.
Three of the most critical nursing activities that can invoke
Medicare coverage included in the administrative criteria are as follows:
1. Overall management and evaluation of an individual's care
plan ( 42 CFR 409.33(a)(1));
2. Observation and assessment of the patient's changing
condition. (This includes identifying and evaluating the patient's need for
modification of treatment or for additional medical procedures until the
condition stabilizes.) ( 42 CFR 409.33(a)(2));
3. Patient education services ( 42 CFR 409.33(a)(3 ) ).
Importantly, while these provisions were deleted from the
regulations in July, 1998, they were reinstated by federal regulations issued in
July, 1999. In reinstating theses provisions the Secretary noted:
Our reason for deleting the explicit references in the
regulations to management and evaluation, observation and assessment, and
patient education was not that they no longer represented appropriate
examples of skilled care, but rather, because we believed that these
separate references were no longer necessary in view of the clinical
indicators that have been incorporated into the upper 26 RUG-III groups.
However, in order to avoid possible confusion on this point, we are
accepting the commenters= suggestion to reinstate these categories as
specific examples in the SNF level of care regulations. 64 FR 41670 (July
30, 1999).
In an April 28, 1999 letter to the Center for Medicare
Advocacy regarding the deleted examples of skilled nursing, Nancy-Ann Min
DeParle, the Administrator of the Health Care Financing Administration, also
made this important point:
...we did not intend that our deletion of care plan
management/evaluation, observation and assessment and patient education
would indicate that we no longer regard these services as appropriate
examples of skilled care.
Advocates should remember these important coverage rules and
the Administration's commentary when seeking benefits
for skilled nursing facility patients in order to insure that they obtain the
Medicare coverage to which they are entitled. This is particularly true when
advocating on behalf of patients whose need for daily skilled nursing services
may not be identified through the process of establishing a RUGS classification.
SKILLED NURSING FACILITY ARTICLES AND
UPDATES
-
09/02/10 - You Can Leave
the Nursing Home! (September 2010 Update)
-
08/26/10 -
Extended Observation Stays in Acute Care Hospitals: Criticism, Legislation and
Discussion
-
08/19/10 -
Preventable Emergency Department Visits by Nursing Home Residents
-
06/17/10 -
Health Reform: the Nursing Home Provisions
-
05/20/10 - New GAO Report Demonstrates
Need for Stronger Enforcement of
Nursing Home Quality Standards: Health Reform Provisions Could Help
-
03/25/10 -
Off-Label Drug
Use is Common and Hurts Nursing Home Residents
-
03/10/10 - Recorded Web Seminar:
Overcoming Barriers to Medicare Coverage of Skilled Nursing
Facility Care
-
02/18/10 -
"Observation Services": What can Beneficiaries and Advocates Do?
-
02/04/10 -
Nursing Home Residents'
Access to Physicians and Pain Medication
-
01/07/10 -
Serious Deficiencies in
Nursing Facilities are Understated, and the Problem May Get
Worse.
-
10/15/09 -
CMS Reins in Overpayments
to Skilled Nursing Facilities.
-
05/21/09 - Stimulus checks are coming for nursing home residents.
CMS has made it
clear that money belongs to the residents.
-
05/14/09 - CMS is taking steps to undo
skilled nursing facility
(SNF) overpayment
and abuse.
-
04/30/09 -
Stimulus checks are
coming for nursing home residents. Who keeps that
money? The residents.
-
04/16/09 - Nursing Home Industry Makes
Secret Survey and
Enforcement Proposals to Congress.
-
01/29/09 -
Assisted Living Facility residents can lose their homes if
their facility stops participating in Medicaid.
-
12/18/08 -
CMS Rates Nursing Home
quality on its website, Nursing Home Compare.
-
12/11/08 - When is a hospital stay not a
hospital stay? When the patient is on "Observation
Status."
-
09/11/08 -
New paper by attorneys
Vicki Gottlich, Patricia Nemore, Toby Edelman and Alissa
Halperin discusses
Medicare Special Needs Plans for "Institutionalized individuals".
(.PDF)
-
06/26/08 - CMS plans to rank nursing homes by the end of
2008, but there are concerns
about the proposed five-star rating system for nursing facilities.
-
Center for Medicare Advocacy Report
on Nursing Home Decisions Highlights Need
for Serious Penalties - May 15, 2008
-
The Center for
Medicare Advocacy supports CMS' recent disclosure of the names of facilities
failing to provide care in compliance with federal standards, but such
disclosures need to be clearly explained to be useful to consumers (.pdf) - March
14, 2008
-
The New CMS
tool for Assessing Nursing
Facility Penalties Assures They Will Remain Low -
February 21, 2008
-
CMS' Final
Report on Quality Indicator Survey (QIS) Process (.pdf) - December, 2007
-
Senators Focus on Poor
Quality Care in Nursing Homes - December 27, 2007
-
Facing Discontinuation of Skilled Nursing Facility Care?
Know your Appeal Rights for Traditional Medicare -
December 13, 2007
-
Trends In
Nursing Home Ownership and Quality: Statement To The Subcommittee On Health,
House Ways And Means Committee (.pdf) - November, 2007
-
Comment On
Proposed Rule To Establish Revisit User Fee For Medicare Survey And
Certification Activities - August 27, 2007
-
SNF CEO's
Windfall Could Have Provided More Staff And Services - July 19, 2007
-
Lessons
From
Nursing Home Advocacy: Helpful Strategies
For Assisted Living Evictions
- July 5, 2007
-
20th Anniversary
Of The Nursing Home Reform Law Celebrated: Many Challenges Remain - May
17, 2007
-
Nursing Home Enforcement:
Final Case Studies Report - March 2007
-
Is It Time For Federal
Regulation Of The Assisted Living Industry? - March 22, 2007
-
Maintaining Quality Rehabilitation
Options For Medicare Beneficiaries
- March 8, 2007
-
The "New" Nursing Home Quality Campaign:
Deja Vu All Over Again - September 21, 2006
-
Paying For
Drugs With the Incurred Medical Expense Deduction - June 29, 2006
-
Letter To CMS
Urging Revision Of Psychosocial Outcome Severity Guide - March 30, 2006
-
Letter To
CMS Administrator: Nursing Facility Obligations Under Part D
And The Nursing Home
Reform Law - January 23, 2006
-
CMS To Exclude
Questionable Nurse Staffing Data (.pdf) - May 5, 2005
-
Advocacy Needed To Assure Prescription Drug
Coverage For Nursing Home Residents - March 3, 2005
-
Lawsuit Challenges Rigid Interpretation Of "Inpatient" For A Hospital
Qualifying Stay - December 16, 2004
-
Nursing Home Residents Challenge
"Feeding Assistant" Regulations That Lower Standards Of Care - August 5,
2004
-
Illegal "Improvement"
Standard For SNF Coverage Terminated - July 8, 2004
-
Center For Medicare Advocacy and
National Senior Citizens Law Center Issue Memorandum On Feeding Assistants
In Nursing Facilities - False Premises And False Promises: "Feeding
Assistants Are A Step Backward For Nursing facility Quality Of Care"
- June 2, 2004
-
Center For
Medicare Advocacy, Inc. Denounces Final Rules Permitting "Feeding
Assistants" In Nursing Homes - September 25, 2003
-
Center Co-Authors Paper: Policy
Principles For Assisted Living - May 19, 2003
-
Study By Center for Medicare Advocacy
Dispels Myths About Tort Reform And Nursing Homes - April 16, 2003
-
One Day
After Department Of Health And Human Services Announced Its Nursing Home
Quality Initiative, GAO Issued A Highly Critical Report That Recommended
Delaying The Initiative - January 7, 2003
-
GAO Reports That
Medicare Payments To Most Free-Standing Skilled Nursing Facilities
Substantially Exceed Facilities' Costs - January 7, 2003
-
Limitations On Deposits And Prepayments For Nursing Facility Care In
Medicare And Medicaid - August 5, 2002
-
CMS Proposes To Allow Paid Feeding Assistants In Nursing Homes
- April 10, 2002
-
Center Submits Comments To CMS's
Proposed Revisions To Nursing Home Survey Process - November 15, 2001
-
Keeping Patients On "Observation Status"
Rather Than Admitting Them Harms SNF Patients As Well As Hospital Patients
- February 22, 2000
-
Administrator Deparle's Letter
- April 28, 1999 (One Page)
|