|
Health care reform does not cut Medicare benefits. In fact, health
care reform expands Medicare coverage, by eliminating cost-sharing
for preventive services, adding a yearly wellness visit, limiting
some cost-sharing in private Medicare plans, and closing the Part D
"Donut Hole." It also improves the solvency of the Medicare program
itself. Reform does, however, change some Medicare payment
policies. Some misstated reports of these changes have resulted in
exaggerating public fear of cuts to Medicare benefits. This
Alert summarizes the changes in certain Medicare payments in
order to clarify that the Medicare reforms do not reduce
Medicare’s guaranteed benefits.
The Affordable Care Act[i]
achieves savings in the Medicare program through a series of payment
reforms, service delivery innovations, and increased efforts to
reduce fraud, waste, and abuse. The actual projected reduction in
Medicare spending is $428 billion over 10 years, after $105
billion in new Medicare spending is taken into
consideration.[ii]
These projections actually extend the life of the Medicare trust
fund by about a decade. It is important to stress that none of the
payment reforms affect Medicare's guaranteed benefit packages.
The law specifically states that the guaranteed benefits in Medicare
Part A and Part B will not be reduced or eliminated as a result of
changes to the Medicare program.[iii]
Most Medicare Cuts Are to Private Insurance Plans
The greatest amount of savings in Medicare, about $130 billion over
10 years,
[iv] will be achieved by reducing overpayments to private
Medicare Advantage (MA) plans. These are the insurance plans that
contract with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
under Medicare Part C to provide benefits to those who voluntarily
enroll. MA plans must provide all of the guaranteed benefits
under Part A and Part B; they may provide additional benefits
with moneys they receive in excess of the cost of providing the
guaranteed benefits.
Under the funding mechanism in effect before enactment of the
Affordable Care Act, MA plans were paid, on average, 9 - 13%
more than the traditional Medicare program to provide the same
coverage. These extra payments resulted in Medicare Part B
premiums being $3.35 higher per month for all beneficiaries in 2009,
and resulted in the federal government (and taxpayers) spending $14
billion more than it would have had Medicare Advantage plan
enrollees remained in the traditional Medicare program.[v]
The Affordable Care Act phases in changes to the MA overpayments,
starting with a freeze in payments to MA plans for 2011. Payments
will be based on national county benchmarks, with plans being paid a
fixed percentage of traditional Medicare costs. As a result of this
payment formula, plans in some lower-paid counties, generally rural
and suburban areas, will continue to receive payments that exceed
the traditional Medicare amount, while plans in higher paid
counties, many of them large cities, may see substantial reductions.[vi]
Rebates (an amount plans receive if they bid less than the county
benchmark) will also be reduced. The new payment structure also
provides for an increase in payments by up to 5% for plans that
receive four or more stars on the CMS star rating system.[vii]
Medicare Advantage Options Remain Robust for 2011
Many people in the health care industry predicted that the change in
MA payments would result in fewer MA plans contracting with CMS,
higher premiums, and reduced benefit packages. CMS announced at the
end of September 2010, however, that these predictions were not
accurate. According to CMS, MA plan premiums for 2011 will be, on
average, $1 less than in 2010, and most beneficiaries will have
choices of Medicare Advantage plans.[viii]
Many MA plans that chose to leave the Medicare market in 2011 did
so as a result of changes made by the Medicare Improvement for
Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA)[ix]
and NOT because of the Affordable Care Act.
Those who point to the cuts in the overpayments to MA plans as proof
that Medicare benefits were reduced by health care reform
legislation fail to acknowledge that the Affordable Care Act
improves benefits offered by MA plans. For example, the
new law sets limits on the amount of cost-sharing plans can charge
for chemotherapy administration services, renal dialysis services,
and skilled nursing care services.[x]
Further, starting in 2014, 85% of MA plan revenues must go towards
benefits, not profits, or plans may be subject to sanctions.[xi]
Changes in Payments to Providers
Many of health care reform's payment reforms consist of changes in
the methodology used to calculate payment updates for hospitals,
skilled nursing facilities, home health agencies, and ambulance
services, among others. Payment updates for these providers are
based on an update to the "market basket" specific to the provider
type that reflects the increased cost in doing business. In
general terms, the Affordable Care Act reduces the annual
market basket increase by a specific productivity adjustment that is
phased in over a set statutory time frame.[xii]
Thus, the new law does not reduce payments from 2010 level, but only
reduces the amount of payment increases.
Changes in Payments to Physicians
Payments to physicians are based on a formula, the sustainable
growth rate or SGR, that was enacted as part of the Balanced Budget
Act of 1997.[xiii]
Because application of the formula would have resulted in negative
updates to physician payments, Congress has enacted delays to its
implementation since 2003. The Affordable Care Act did not
make any revisions to the physician payment formula. Unless
Congress continues its practice of enacting a temporary "doc fix,"
or, more unlikely, reforms the method for calculating doctor
reimbursement,[xiv]
a reduction in payment to physicians will go into effect on December
1, 2010. The cuts remain a potential threat to access to doctors
for Medicare beneficiaries.
Linking Payment to Quality Outcomes
In an earlier Alert[xv]
we reported, how the Affordable Care Act moves in the
direction of linking payment to quality outcomes for entities that
provide services to Medicare beneficiaries. Congress has placed
emphasis on efforts to measure quality and to provide payment for
only those services and procedures that meet certain quality of care
standards. As stated above, Medicare Advantage plans may be entitled
to bonus payments if they score highly on quality measures. In
addition, hospitals will be given incentives to reduce hospital
acquired conditions with respect to hospital discharges starting in
2015.[xvi]
Payments also may be reduced to certain providers in the future if
they do not provide high quality health care. For example, beginning
in 2012, hospital payments may be reduced if a hospital is
determined to have excessive readmissions for identified conditions
or procedures that are high volume or high cost and for which the
readmission rate is high. A readmission is defined as a return to
the same or a different hospital for the same condition within a
time frame to be specified by the Secretary of Health and Human
Services (HHS).[xvii]
Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB)
The Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) is a new
quasi-governmental body which will take over from Congress the
function of establishing Medicare payment policies. Policy makers
anticipate that the IPAB, which is to commence operations in 2014,
will be able to achieve another $15.5 billion in savings to the
Medicare program from 2014-2019.[xviii]
The 15-member Board will be appointed by the president and confirmed
by Congress; members will serve full-time. The IPAB will be advised
by a 10-member consumer advisory council. The Affordable Care
Act includes strict parameters for IPAB activity. It must submit
proposals to Congress to reduce Medicare spending if
statutorily-defined parameters are met. These proposals will go
into effect if Congress does not act.
Importantly, the law prohibits the IPAB from changing
eligibility or benefits, reducing the Part D low-income subsidy, or
rationing care.[xix]
Conclusion
The Affordable Care Act slows the growth in future Medicare
spending by reducing overpayments to private Medicare Advantage
plans, by restructuring up-dates in payments to many providers, and
by tying payments to improved quality of care. Health care
reform does not reduce Medicare benefits.
[i] The health care
reform law: Pub.L.111-148, the Patient Protection and
Affordability Care Act of 2010 (PPACA), on March 23, 2010,
and Pub. L. 111-152, the Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act of 2010 (HCERA), on March 30, 2010.
[ii] CBO March 20,
2010; Joint Committee on Taxation Revenue Estimates,
JCX-17-10 (March 20, 2010).
[iii] PPACA (Pub.
L. 111-148), § 3602
[v] Report to
Congress, Medicare Payment Policy (March 2010);
www.medpac.gov/documents/Mar_10Ch04.pdf.
[vi] For a
discussion of the effects of the new payment structure on
different communities, see, B.Biles, G. Arnold, Medicare
Advantage Payment Provisions (G.W.U. March 2010), available
at http://www.gwumc.edu/sphhs/departments/healthpolicy/dhp_publications/pub_uploads/dhpPublication_8C515659-5056-9D20-3D3985C6A1BBC2A5.pdf.
[ix]Section 162 of
the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of
2008, Pub. L. 110-225 required private fee for service
Medicare Advantage plans to have provider networks in most
areas of the country, effective January 1, 2011
[xi] HCERA §1103. A
plan's contract must be terminated if the plan fails to have
a Medical Loss Ratio of 85% for 5 consecutive years.
[xii] PPACA §§
3401, 10319; HCERA §§ 1105
[xiii] Balanced
Budget Act of 1997 (BBA), Pub. L. 105-33 (Aug. 5, 1997).
[xiv] One estimate
places the cost at $276 billion over the next 10 years.
Health Policy Brief: Paying Physicians for Medicare
Services (June 25, 2010); available at
www.healthafffairs.org/healthpolicybriefs/briefs_pdfs/healthpolicybrief_18.pdf.
[xv] See, Health
Reform: Linking Medicare Payment to Quality Outcomes (June
25, 2010), available at www.medicareadvocacy.org.
[xvi] PPACA §3008,
amending 42 U.S.C. §1395ww.
[xvii] PPACA §
3025. Beneficiary advocates will watch implementation of
this provision closely to ensure that hospitals do not try
to avoid payment cuts and quality improvement by placing
patients in “observation status” rather than admitting them
as inpatients. See, “Observation Services: What Can
Beneficiaries and Advocates Do?” (Feb. 18, 2010),
www.medicareadvocacy.org.
[xviii] CBO March
20, 2010; Joint Committee on Taxation Revenue Estimates,
JCX-17-10 (March 20, 2010).
[xix] PPACA §
3403(c), adding Section 1899 of the Social Security Act.
|