|
Sally Hart, J.D., M.B.T.
Center For Medicare Advocacy, Inc.
INTRODUCTION
This paper discusses the inclusion of a coordinated care
benefit in the traditional, fee-for-service Medicare program. However, the
coordinated care benefit is a complex one, and there are many choices to be made
in settling on the specific elements of its design. In this paper we will
explore legal issues and policy questions raised by the prospect of a new
Medicare coordinated care benefit. A draft of legislation that would amend the
Medicare statute to establish the coordinated care benefit is the starting point
of the discussions.
The federal Medicare program, established in 1965, provides
health insurance for elderly and disabled individuals in this country. However,
the Medicare package of benefits has focused traditionally on skilled services
and acute care episodes, excluding many kinds of personal services needed by
individuals with chronic health conditions. This focus causes hardship and
suffering among many elderly and disabled beneficiaries who cannot arrange or
pay for these necessary medical and health-related services on their own.
Social Security Act, Title XVIII.
HEALTH INSURANCE FOR THE AGED AND DISABLED.
Discussion:
The Medicare statute is found in the Social Security Act, at Title XVIII. It is
codified in the United States Code at Title 42, Section 1395. The Medicare
program is divided into two coverage components, Part A and Part B. Part A
covers hospital, skilled nursing facility, hospice, CORF (Comprehensive
Outpatient Rehabilitation Facility) and home health care. It is financed by the
Medicare Trust Fund which is funded by matching employer and employee taxes.
Part B coverage includes physician services, outpatient therapies, diagnostic
tests, medical equipment and additional home health care. It is financed by
beneficiary premiums and general revenue funds. While the traditional Medicare
program is often referred to as the "fee-for-service" program, most services are
now reimbursed according to various, predetermined payment systems.
Medicare Part C, more often known as Medicare+Choice, was
added to the program in 1998. The Medicare+Choice program comprises a variety of
financing and service delivery options, most notably managed care plans.
Beneficiaries who choose a
Medicare+Choice plan should receive at least the same level
of services and coverage as in the traditional program. Medicare+Choice plans
are paid a capitated rate for Medicare covered services provided to their
beneficiary members.
Part A. HOSPITAL INSURANCE FOR THE AGED AND DISABLED.
Sec. 1811 (at 42 U.S.C. § 1395c). DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM.
[Add ", and coordinated care services" after
"hospice services", and remove the "and" before "hospice services".]
Discussion:
The proposed coordinated care benefit consists of a
comprehensive package of services prescribed by the attending physician and
supervised by a care manager working with the physician. Its characteristics are
similar to those of the institutional, hospice, and home health services covered
under Part A of Medicare. Unlike the kinds of individual medical services
covered under Part B of Medicare, the coordinated care benefit will usually
include a bundle of different kinds of services. Unlike the managed care option
established in Part C of Medicare, however, the coordinated care benefit is not
primarily a financing system. Thus, the most suitable place for the new
coordinated care benefit appears to be the Part A section of the Medicare
statute.
The coordinated care benefit appears to most closely resemble
the current Medicare hospice benefit. Although there are significant differences
in terms of the purposes of the two benefits, the expected durations of their
services, and perhaps the payment methodologies (hospice being an all
encompassing capitated benefit ,and coordinated care possibly a combination of
structures), other characteristics such as the inclusion of social services and
the focus on maintenance rather than improvement are the same for both hospice
and coordinated care benefits.
Sec. 1812 (at 42 U.S.C. § 1395d). SCOPE OF BENEFITS.
[Add to subsection (a) a new subsection (5), as follows:]
"(5) coordinated care services provided to an individual in
need of such care. "
Add a new subsection (g), as follows:
"(g) (1) An individual shall be determined to be in need of
coordinated care based on,
(A) a physician certification of need based on the likelihood that without such
services the individual's condition will deteriorate, renewed at least once
every 60 days, and
(B) a finding of a significant reduction in the individual's ability to retain
maximum level of function in a community-based environment; and
(2) An individual who has been determined to be in need of coordinated care can
elect a coordinated care agency from which to receive such services. The
election of a particular agency can be made and revoked by such individual on a
monthly basis."
Discussion:
A key policy decision that must be made in mapping out the
coordinated care benefit is determining the criteria for eligibility.
Some commentators have looked to diagnoses of particular
medical conditions as indicators of the need for coordinated care. Such
diagnoses include: asthma, diabetes, congestive heart failure and related
cardiac conditions, hypertension, coronary artery disease, cardiovascular and
cerebrovascular conditions, multiple sclerosis, and chronic lung disease. In our
draft legislation we have not required specific diagnoses for eligibility, but
left the determination of medical need to the judgment of the beneficiary's
attending physician. This too resembles the approach taken in the Medicare
hospice benefit.
A second issue that is related to the foregoing question of
diagnosis is whether the coordinated care benefit should be limited to
beneficiaries who are chronically ill, or should also be available to
beneficiaries who are experiencing an acute care episode from which they can be
expected to recover. In the draft legislation the benefit is not limited to
those who are chronically ill, because some individuals in an acute care episode
are also in need of coordinated care services. However, this broader eligibility
standard may raise questions of cost that could make the new benefit less
politically viable.
Sec. 1813 (at 42 U.S.C. § 1395e). DEDUCTIBLES AND COINSURANCE.
[Add to subsection (a) a new subsection (5), as follows:]
"(5) (A) [Here describe any coinsurance or deductibles to be
imposed with respect to the coordinated care benefits.]
(B) During the period when an individual is receiving coordinated care services
by the election described in section 1812(a)(5), no coinsurance payments or
deductibles other than those under subparagraph (A) shall apply with respect to
such coordinated care services."
Discussion:
If the hospice benefit is used as a model for the coordinated
care benefit, beneficiaries would be required to contribute some amount of
coinsurance. Hospice service recipients must pay coinsurance for outpatient
drugs and biologicals that approximates 5% of the average cost for drugs to the
particular coordinated care agency, not to exceed $5 per prescription. They also
pay coinsurance for respite care that, again, is calculated as 5% of the average
cost of such services to the particular coordinated care agency.
Coinsurance requirements might be imposed on some or all of
the coordinated care package of services. Using Medicare hospice coinsurance
amounts as a model, these coinsurance requirements would be 5% of the average
cost of the particular service to the provider. Alternatively, coinsurance for
coordinated care services could be imposed at a uniform flat rate, such as $5
per service.
Other options that should be considered include imposition of
a deductible at the beginning of a period when coordinated care services are
used, with or without coinsurance requirements for subsequent services.
Sec. 1814 (at 42 U.S.C. § 1395f). CONDITIONS OF AND LIMITATIONS ON PAYMENT
FOR SERVICES.
[Add to subsection (a) a new subsection (9), as follows:]
"(9) In the case of coordinated care provided to an
individual–
(A) (i)
The individual's attending physician certifies that such services are required
to prevent
deterioration in the individual's medical condition;
(ii) There is a finding of a significant reduction in the
individual's ability to perform activities of
daily living measured by a functional screening test developed by the Secretary;
and
(iii) The individual's attending physician and care manager recertify at
the beginning of each
subsequent 60 day period that the individual continues to meet the conditions
specified in (i)
and (ii).
(B) A written plan for providing coordinated care services with respect to such
individual has been developed for the individual by the individual's personal
care manager and attending physician prior to the beginning of services, and the
written plan is reviewed and updated by the care manager and attending physician
to respond to the individual's current needs once every 60 days thereafter.
(C) The delivery to the individual of the coordinated care services specified in
the written care plan shall be supervised by the care manager to assure that the
services are actually provided on a dependable basis and that they meet
standards of quality care."
Discussion:
As noted above, this model assumes an ongoing level of
involvement in the coordinated care services benefit by the individual
beneficiary's attending physician. Some other models assume that the attending
physician will be less involved in designing and monitoring coordinated care
services, and place sole or primary responsibility on the coordinated care
agency and the care manager to initiate, supervise and modify the care plan and
services. The rationale for the latter model is that constant physician
involvement in non-acute care for chronically ill, but stable, patients is
unnecessary and unrealistic in light of other demands on physician time and
interests. See, e.g., "The Physician's Role in Medicare Home Health, 2001, OIG
Report, OEI-02-00-00620, December, 2001.
On the other hand, the rationale for identifying the
physician as the key to commencing and continuing care is that patients'
attending physicians are best situated to know their medical conditions and
related needs. In addition, Medicare has historically based authorization for
services in the hands of physicians, and physicians should be actively involved
in their patients' care.
[Add a new subsection (m) that describes the payment
mechanism to be used for Medicare coordinated care services.]
Section 1814 (42 U.S.C. § 1395f) is also the section of the
Medicare statute where provisions establishing the way in which Medicare will
reimburse coordinated care providers for services to beneficiaries should be
located. For example, the current Section 1814(i) describes the way Medicare
reimburses hospices for their services, and subsection (m) added by the draft
legislation would similarly describe the reimbursement method for coordinated
care services.
However, there are a number of different reimbursement
methods that must be carefully evaluated in order to create incentives for
coordinated care providers to deliver services that are adequate in quantity,
high in quality, and yet reasonable in cost to the Medicare trust fund. Payments
options that should be considered are: traditional fee-for-service payments;
prospective payments based on level-of-care-need groupings of beneficiaries; and
flat capitation payments per beneficiary. In addition, to the extent that the
coordinated care services include services of other distinct providers such as
home health agencies, pass-through reimbursement according to established
Medicare methods for such other providers might be adopted.
Sec. 1816 (at 42 U.S.C. § 1395h). USE OF PUBLIC AGENCIES OR PRIVATE
ORGANIZATIONS TO
FACILITATE PAYMENT TO PROVIDERS OF SERVICES.
Discussion:
The Medicare program uses intermediaries or contractors to
deal directly with providers in the administration of the program. Increasingly,
Medicare uses a small number of specialized contractors to deal with particular
service providers. For example, Medicare now contracts with regional home health
intermediaries and regional hospice intermediaries who have expertise in the
provision of home health or hospice services. It might be helpful to include in
the statute similar provisions concerning use of specialized intermediaries to
administer payment of Medicare claims for coordinated care services.
Part D. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
Sec. 1861 (at 42 U.S.C. § 1395x). DEFINITIONS OF SERVICES,
INSTITUTIONS, ETC.
[Add a new subsection (uu), as follows:]
"(uu) (1) The term "coordinated care services" means items
and services furnished by, or by others under arrangements made by, a
coordinated care agency to an individual who meets the eligibility criteria set
out in section 1812(g)(1), which are prescribed in a personal care plan
developed by the individual's care manager and attending physician.
Discussion:
Section 1861 is the definitional section of the Medicare
statute. In the following subsections the details of the new coordinated care
benefit must be carefully spelled out.
(2) "Coordinated care services" shall include any of the following items and
services–
(A) Care manager services;
(B) Home health services, including:
(i) Nursing care;
(ii) Home Health aide;
(iii) Medical supplies (including drugs and biologicals),
equipment, and appliances;
(iv) Physical therapy;
(v) Occupational therapy;
(vi) Respiratory therapy;
(vii) Speech and audiology services; and
(viii) Counseling and other behavioral health services;
(C) Medical supplies (including drugs and biologicals) and durable medical
equipment;
(D) Necessary transportation services;
(E) Adult day health services, including:
(i) Planned care supervision and activities;
(ii) Personal care;
(iii) Personal living skills training;
(iv) Meals and health monitoring;
(v) Preventive, therapeutic, and restorative health related
services; and,
(vi) Counseling and behavioral health services;
(F) Personal care services;
(G) Homemaker services;
(H) Home delivered meals; and
(I) Discharge planning services.
Discussion:
The foregoing list of services was compiled from several
different models of coordinated care programs, including a state Home and
Community Based Services (HCBS) Medicaid program. Of course, this coordinated
care benefit would be in addition to the other Medicare covered services such as
hospital care, physician services, etc.
The list includes a home health benefit as part of a broader
bundle of services supervised by the care manager. Unlike in the current
Medicare home health benefit, to receive home health services as part of
coordinated care the individual would not necessarily be home bound or need a
skilled service. Another option would be to leave the home health benefit out of
the coordinated care package of services and provide it separately, but this
poses a risk of diluting the care manager's ability to respond to an
individual's needs in a coordinated manner. In addition, the traditional home
health benefit is only available if the individual is home bound and requires
certain defined skilled services, and a more limited, less flexible level of
care is coverable.
The suggested benefit package includes a number of services
not previously covered by Medicare. These include outpatient drugs and
biologicals now available only through hospice. (This drug benefit could be
removed or limited if it proves politically unacceptable.) The covered services
also include counselling and other behavioral health services, responding to the
identification of depression as widespread among chronically ill elders. Other
services that are less directly medical in nature than traditional Medicare
services will be offered in the coordinated care benefit package. These include
transportation services, adult day health services, personal care and homemaker
services, and home delivered meals. Although not medical in nature, it has been
recognized that these services are essential to maintaining the health of
individuals who have limitations in their ability to perform activities of daily
living.
(3) "Coordinated care services" shall not be limited to services that are
considered "skilled", "acute" or "restorative", but shall also include unskilled
health-related services provided to eligible individuals who have "chronic" or
"maintenance" care needs.
Discussion:
As discussed above, one of the key purposes of the
coordinated care benefit is to provide elderly and disabled beneficiaries with
services that have not traditionally been covered by Medicare because of
limiting threshold criteria and limitations on coverage to services that are
"skilled" or "acute" in nature. In order to make it perfectly clear that these
traditional restrictions are not to be applied to the coordinated care benefit,
specific language mandating a more liberal coverage standard should be included
in the legislation.
(4) The term "coordinated care agency" means a public or private organization
(or a subdivision thereof) which--
(A) (i) is primarily engaged in providing the care and services
described in paragraphs (1), (2),
and (3);
(ii) provides for such care and services in individuals' homes on an
outpatient basis; and
(iii) in the case of services described in paragraphs (1),(2), and (3) that are
not provided directly by the agency or organization, the agency or organization
must maintain coordination and management responsibility for all such services
furnished to an individual, regardless of the location or facility in which such
services are furnished;
Discussion:
The coordinated care benefit package is so broad that
agencies may not have the capacity to provide all of the diverse types of
benefits directly. It is anticipated that the care manager may arrange for
services to be provided by other agencies so long as the care manager
coordinates and remains ultimately responsible for all services provided to the
client.
(B) has an interdisciplinary group of personnel which–
(i) includes at least one physician (as defined in subsection
(r)(1)), one registered nurse, and
one social worker, employed by or, in the case of the physician, under contract
with the
agency or organization;
(ii) provides (or supervises the provision of) the care and services
described in paragraphs
(1),(2), and (3); and
(iii) establishes the policies governing the provision of such care and
services;
(C) maintains central clinical records on all patients;
(D) in the case of an agency or organization in any State in which State or
applicable local law provides for the licensing of agencies or organizations of
this nature, is licensed according to such law; and
(E) meets such other requirements as the Secretary may find necessary in the
interest of the health and safety of the individuals who are provided care and
services by such agency or organization.
Discussion:
This draft legislation proposes certain minimum operational
and licensing standards for coordinated care agencies. These standards might be
expanded if minimum operational criteria are clear, or alternatively, they might
be reduced if greater flexibility could be offered to this new type of service
agency without compromising beneficiary safeguards.
(5) (A) An individual shall be determined to be in need of chronic care based on
a finding of both–
(i) medical condition, as certified by the individual's attending
physician and renewed at least
once every 60 days; and
(ii) a significant reduction in the individual's ability to perform
activities of daily living,
measured by an instrument and process developed by the Secretary in consultation
with
experts in the fields of geriatric medicine, public health, and geriatric social
services.
(B) The term "attending physician" means, with respect to an individual, the
physician (as defined in subsection (r)(1)), who may be employed by a
coordinated care agency, whom the individual identifies as having the most
significant role in the determination and delivery of medical care at the time
the individual makes an election to receive coordinated care benefits.
Discussion:
This subsection assumes that a critical role in the
development and delivery of coordinated care will be played by the individual's
attending physician. However, mindful of the fact that all beneficiaries may not
have an ongoing relationship with a personal physician willing to carry out this
role, the draft legislation allows coordinated care agencies to supply this need
through in-house physicians or medical directors.
(6) (A) An entity which is certified as a provider of services other than a
coordinated care agency shall be considered for purposes of certification as a
coordinated care agency, to have met any requirements under paragraph (4) which
are also the same requirements for certification as such other type of provider.
The Secretary shall coordinate surveys for determining certification under the
title so as to provide, to the extent feasible, for simultaneous surveys of an
entity which seeks to be certified as a coordinated care agency and as a
provider of services of another type.
(B) Any entity which is certified as a coordinated care agency and as a
provider of another type shall have separate provider agreements under section
1866 and shall file separate cost reports with respect to costs incurred in
providing coordinated care services and in providing other services and items
under this title."
Discussion: It is expected that the same agency may provide
several kinds of Medicare services, for example both home health services and
coordinated care services. In such situations, the draft legislation allows for
simultaneous certification surveys to ease the administrative burden on such
agencies so far as possible.
Sec. 1863 (at 42 U.S.C. § 1395z). CONSULTATION WITH STATE AGENCIES AND OTHER
ORGANIZATIONS TO DEVELOP CONDITIONS OF PARTICIPATION
FOR PROVIDERS OF SERVICES.
[Add in the first sentence of this
subsection after "(mm)(1)", "and, (uu)(4)." Remove the "and" before
"(mm)(1)".]
Discussion:
In order to develop conditions of participation for providers
of coordinated care services that are as compatible as possible with the
requirements of other accrediting entities and health insurers, the draft
legislation directs the Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services to consult
with these other entities and insurers.
Sec. 1866 (at 42 U.S.C. § 1395cc). AGREEMENTS WITH PROVIDERS OF SERVICES.
[In subsection (a)(1)((F)(ii),
substitute "home health agencies, and coordinated care agencies" for the current
phrase "and home health agencies".
In subsection (a)(1)(P), after "home health agencies" add
"and coordinated care agencies".
In subsection (a)(1)(Q), after "home health agencies," add
"coordinated care agencies,".
In subsection (f)(2)(C), after "home health agency" add "or
coordinated care agency".]
Discussion:
In this subsection of the proposed legislation, terms of
Medicare contracts with providers of coordinated care services that are similar
to those already in use with respect to providers of home health services and
hospice services are specified. It may be that additional contract terms
peculiar to the administration of the coordinated care benefit should be
included here as well.
Sec. 1869(a)(1) (at 42 U.S.C. § 1395ff(a)(1)). DETERMINATIONS; APPEALS.
[Add to subsection (a)(1) a new subsection (D), as follows:]
(D) Cases in which a provider of services plans to reduce or
terminate services,
or to discharge the individual. In such situations, written notice must be given
to the individual by the provider, including a specific, personalized
explanation of the reasons for reduction or discharge and a description of the
individual's right to an initial or expedited determination.
Discussion:
This portion of the draft legislation provides protections
for beneficiaries against adverse coverage decisions made by their coordinated
care agencies. It addresses a current gap in the Medicare appeals process,
because Medicare providers often have financial incentives to reduce or
terminate services for certain beneficiaries. To protect beneficiaries,
providers should be required to give written notices like those required of
carriers and intermediaries. The written notice described in the draft
legislation would help give the beneficiary an opportunity to question the
reduction or termination of coordinated care services.
Sec. 1891 (at 42 U.S.C. § 1395bbb). CONDITIONS OF PARTICIPATION FOR HOME
HEALTH
AGENCIES.
[Add a new subsection (h), as follows:]
(h) A coordinated care agency that provides home
health services directly rather than under arrangements
with a
participating home health agency shall be subject to the conditions of
participation set out in this
subsection.
Discussion:
This subsection of the draft legislation simply states that
coordinated agencies that provide home health care directly must meet the
Medicare home health conditions of participation.
Sec. 1897 (at 42 U.S.C. § 1395--). INTERFACE OF MEDICARE AND MEDICAID
PROGRAMS'
COORDINATED CARE BENEFITS.
[At the end of Part D of the Medicare
statute add a section setting up any interface with Medicaid program benefits,
such as HCBS, that is part of the proposed coordinated care benefit.]
Discussion:
Many Medicare beneficiaries who are in need of coordinated
care services have sufficiently limited income and resources that they are
eligible or nearly eligible for Medicaid services. Some states have already
elected as part of their Medicaid programs to establish Home and Community Based
Services (HCBS) benefits that provide many of the non-skilled services that
comprise the proposed Medicare coordinated care package. An existing and
comprehensive care care model is also found in the PACE program. Since the
essence of the coordinated care benefit is comprehensive care management, it is
very important that the Medicare and Medicaid programs combine their resources
to create a seamless benefit for dual eligible individuals. This might be done
by putting federal Medicare money into a system administered by each state for
both Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries, or perhaps by separately funding
coordinated care under common standards. Further study must be given to devising
a system for optimizing the resources of both Medicare and Medicaid in providing
coordinated care to beneficiaries.
CONCLUSION
Thoughtful observers of the Medicare program recommend that
the current gap in health-related services be filled by providing a new
coordinated care benefit. In this paper, a first attempt has been made to draft
legislation to fill that gap. The detailed process of drafting such legislation
forces attention to the very specific components of a coordinated care benefit,
including: eligibility standards, services to be provided, certification
requirements, monitoring of providers, payment mechanisms, beneficiary appeals,
quality assurance, and integration with other insurers and government programs.
Doubtless there will be many additions and improvements to the model suggested,
but it is hoped that the formal structure of the draft legislation presented
here will provide a useful focus for further planning.
|